| Penetration Testing |
Before we test your network, we provide you with a fully documented test plan and work with you to find an acceptable level of exploitation, and define Rules of Engagement for the operation. We will notify you immediately if the test results include any critical security flaws or any other event that would require emergency intervention on your network. After completion of the Penetration Test, The Prometheus Group's Security Engineers will report the findings to management and technical personnel, illustrating the techniques, analysis, and results of the assessment. The report covers:
The ever-increasing volume, complexity and sophistication of attacks on organizations requires that you maintain constant vigilance in all aspects of data protection. We work with you to determine the appropriate frequency for penetration testing to ensure that your network and information are protected from new sources and types of malicious attacks. NOTE: The goal of a Penetration Test is to break into a network. To do so, The Prometheus Group's engineers must necessarily pose temporarily as bad actors. Truly bad actors are not constrained by client requirements, uptime issues or proper authorization. While The Prometheus Group takes careful measures to avoid any negative impact while posing as bad actors, the attack tool set and techniques necessarily become more direct, and the risk of negative impact rises. Another way of viewing the process is thus:
The vast majority of Security Posture Assessments fall into the top category, Cooperative-Cooperative, with some elements of Cooperative-Hostile. Penetration Testing normally falls into the bottom two categories, where The Prometheus Group assumes a hostile posture and utilizes a larger and more ‘unfriendly’ tool set, up to and including denial-of-service tools. Some of the techniques utilized by The Prometheus Group are large-scale packet manipulation, Layer 2 protocol manipulation, buffer overflows, SQL injection, social engineering, spear-phishing, and other techniques considered ‘hacker’ activities. These practices carry an element of risk which may not be suitable for certain organizations, in which case we recommend a Security Posture Assessment using industry-standard tools and techniques as an alternative. |
||||||||||||||||||



